HomeStroke: Vascular and Interventional NeurologyVol. 2, No. 5Endovascular Biopsy for Detection of Somatic Mosaicism in Human Fusiform Cerebral Aneurysms Open AccessLetterPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toOpen AccessLetterPDF/EPUBEndovascular Biopsy for Detection of Somatic Mosaicism in Human Fusiform Cerebral Aneurysms Joseph H. Garcia, Ethan A. Winkler, MD, PhD, Kerstin Müller, PhD, Evan Kao, PhD, Kazim Narsinh, MD, Nerissa Ko, MD, Patricia Cornett, MD, Adib A. Abla, MD, Joseph T. Shieh, MD, PhD and Daniel L. Cooke, MD Joseph H. GarciaJoseph H. Garcia , Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, , University of California San Francisco, , San Francisco, , CA, , Department of Neurological Surgery, , University of California San Francisco, , San Francisco, , CA, Search for more papers by this author , Ethan A. WinklerEthan A. Winkler , Department of Neurological Surgery, , University of California San Francisco, , San Francisco, , CA, , Department of Neurological Surgery, , Barrow Neurological Institute, , Phoenix, , AZ, Search for more papers by this author , Kerstin MüllerKerstin Müller , Siemens Medical Solutions Inc, , Malvern, , PA, Search for more papers by this author , Evan KaoEvan Kao , Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, , University of California San Francisco, , San Francisco, , CA, Search for more papers by this author , Kazim NarsinhKazim Narsinh , Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, , University of California San Francisco, , San Francisco, , CA, Search for more papers by this author , Nerissa KoNerissa Ko , Department of Neurology, , University of California San Francisco, , San Francisco, , CA, Search for more papers by this author , Patricia CornettPatricia Cornett , Division of Hematology and Oncology, , Department of Medicine, , University of California San Francisco, , San Francisco, , CA, Search for more papers by this author , Adib A. AblaAdib A. Abla , Department of Neurological Surgery, , University of California San Francisco, , San Francisco, , CA, Search for more papers by this author , Joseph T. ShiehJoseph T. Shieh , Division of Medical Genetics, , Department of Pediatrics, , University of California San Francisco, , San Francisco, , CA, , Institute of Human Genetics, , University of California San Francisco, , San Francisco, , CA, Search for more papers by this author and Daniel L. CookeDaniel L. Cooke *Correspondence to: Daniel L. Cooke, MD, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, Neurointerventional Radiology Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 505 Parnassus Ave, L‐349, San Francisco, CA 94143. E‐mail: E-mail Address: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3694-413X , Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, , University of California San Francisco, , San Francisco, , CA, Search for more papers by this author Originally published18 Jul 2022https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.122.000354Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology. 2022;2:e000354Other version(s) of this articleYou are viewing the most recent version of this article. Previous versions: July 18, 2022: Ahead of Print Endovascular biopsy is an emerging percutaneous technology to acquire genetic information from the endothelial lining of cerebrovascular pathologic conditions with angiography. Initial applications have relied on laboratory‐based genome‐wide sequencing technologies, limiting widespread clinical adoption. Somatic activating DNA mutations occur in human cerebrovascular pathologic conditions and contribute to cerebral aneurysm pathogenesis.1 Targeted molecular classification may facilitate application of precision‐based therapeutics in cerebrovascular medicine, especially to aneurysms not amenable to existing endovascular or open surgical procedures. Herein, we describe the first in‐human use of endovascular biopsy to detect a pathogenic somatic activating mutation in dolichoectatic fusiform cerebral aneurysms.MethodsPatient specimens and clinical data were obtained with protocols approved by the University of California San Francisco institutional review board and ethics committee. Written informed consented was obtained. Endovascular biopsy was performed in 4 adults presenting with dolichoectatic fusiform cerebral aneurysms, including 1 patient with a known missense gain‐of‐function variant (PDGFRB c1685A>G p.[Tyr562Cys]) detected in a cutaneous vascular malformation on a next‐generation sequencing–based gene panel, as previously described.2 Briefly, cells were extracted off a 0.035‐in Benson wire or detachable platinum coil deployed in the iliac artery or cerebral aneurysm, respectively, to yield patient‐matched peripheral artery or aneurysm cell specimens. Cells were extracted with mechanical agitation in enzyme‐free Cell Dissociation Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and snap frozen. Genomic DNA was extracted with the Quick‐DNA microprep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA) and amplified with the PicoPLEX Single Cell Whole Genome Amplification Kit, as instructed by the manufacturer (Takara Bio USA, San Jose, CA). Genomic DNA integrity was confirmed by electrophoretic analysis on an Agilent 4200 TapeStation System after amplification (Agilent Technologies, Inc, Santa Clara, CA). Digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was performed with a QX100 ddPCR System using a custom‐designed genotyping primer and probe mix to detect the PDGFRB c1685A>G p.(Tyr562Cys) variant (unique assay identifier: dHsaMDS963465264), and analysis was performed with QuantaSoft v1.4 (Bio‐Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). All data are presented as mean±SD.ResultsEndovascular biopsy was performed in a cohort of 4 adults presenting with dolichoectatic fusiform cerebral aneurysms (mean age, 59.8±22.4 years). Each aneurysm was fusiform in morphology, with mean diameter of 17.9±2.0 mm. Biopsied aneurysms included 3 dolichoectatic vertebrobasilar aneurysms and 1 fusiform middle cerebral artery aneurysm. Two patients had multiple aneurysms. No hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications related to the biopsy occurred, and endovascular biopsy yielded 2096.1±342.6 ng of DNA (iliac artery, 2040.0±130.2 ng; aneurysm, 2152.2±498.6; P=0.68).Using molecular information from the next‐generation sequencing–based gene panel to inform targeted downstream analytics, we performed ddPCR to detect the same PDGFRB variant in endovascular biopsy‐acquired cells. Notably, we detected the PDGFRB variant from both the aneurysm and patient‐matched peripheral vessel in the index patient (Figure 1). Variant‐to‐allele frequencies were 2.8% and 0.9% for the aneurysm and iliac artery, respectively. The variant was not detected in the 3 patients without cutaneous manifestations. Thus, endovascular biopsy may identify somatic activating mutations in fusiform cerebral aneurysms using targeted molecular assays.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 1. Endovascular biopsy of human fusiform cerebral aneurysms.A, Anterior‐posterior projection of cerebral angiogram, showing dolichoectatic fusiform cerebral aneurysm of middle cerebral artery in a 25‐year‐old woman with cutaneous nodules. Injection, right internal carotid artery. B, Representative subtracted roadmap visualization of endovascular biopsy of middle cerebral artery aneurysm. Endovascular biopsy is performed by deploying a platinum coil selectively within the aneurysm, allowing 1 minute of contact with the endothelial lining, and then resheathing the coil. Cells are extracted off the coil, and genetic material is isolated for analysis. C, Visualization of PDGFRB variants detected by digital droplet polymerase chain reaction. The x axis indicates amplitude of positive signal; y axis, paired patient samples; blue dots, positive for PDGFRB c1685A>G p.(Tyr562Cys) variant; arrows, representative positive droplets; red box, index patient with cutaneous manifestations. a indicates aneurysm; and pv, peripheral vessel.DiscussionHerein, we report the first in‐human use of endovascular biopsy to detect somatic activating mutations in dolichoectatic fusiform cerebral aneurysms. Prior endovascular biopsy applications have used genome‐wide sequencing techniques to compare gene expression profiles between patient‐matched peripheral vessels and cerebral aneurysms to infer pathologic changes. Such an approach requires computational methods not readily applicable to clinical specimens and prone to false positives. By contrast, the presented series leverages an incredibly rare case in which cutaneous molecular profiles were used to inform targeted molecular analysis of endovascular biopsy (EB)‐acquired cells from cerebral aneurysms. Thus, these findings further support the feasibility and fidelity of EB to acquire disease‐relevant molecular aberrations with angiography and targeted ddPCR.We notably only detected the somatic activating mutation in the index patient with cutaneous manifestations,3 but none of the other aneurysms sampled. Whether this is reflective of technical variations, regional variations, or the molecular heterogeneity of cerebral aneurysms remains to be determined. One additional patient showed rare positive droplets, likely the product of expected false positivity with rare mutation events, and future studies with larger cohorts are needed to refine thresholds to detect rare somatic mutation events with greater confidence. Ongoing sequencing efforts continue to evolve our understanding of the molecular genetics of cerebral aneurysms, mainly from peripheral blood specimens or surgically acquired tissues.4 As our molecular understanding matures, larger panels of genes may be assembled to perform targeted molecular classification, such as somatic mutation detection or aberrancy in specified gene pathways, in aneurysms or other difficult to treat cerebrovascular pathologic conditions to inform biologic risk stratification with endovascular biopsy in living patients. Treatment outcomes remain suboptimal for dolichoectatic fusiform aneurysms.5 Future studies are warranted to investigate whether endovascular biopsy may yield clinically relevant targetable molecular information to allow trials in precision‐based medicine for fusiform cerebral aneurysms.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to acknowledge Siemens Healthineers in their continued support of neurovascular radiogenomics investigation.Footnotes*Correspondence to: Daniel L. Cooke, MD, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, Neurointerventional Radiology Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 505 Parnassus Ave, L‐349, San Francisco, CA 94143. E‐mail: daniel.[email protected]edu#J. H. Garcia and Dr Winkler contributed equally.References1 Karasozen Y, Osbun JW, Parada CA, Busald T, Tatman P, Gonzalez‐Cuyar LF, Hale CJ, Alcantara D, O'Driscoll M, Dobyns WB, et al. Somatic PDGFRB activating variants in fusiform cerebral aneurysms. Am J Hum Genet. 2019; 104:968‐976.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Narsinh KH, Narsinh K, McCoy DB, Sun Z, Halabi C, Meisel K, Tihan T, Chaganti K, Amans MR, Halbach VV, et al. Endovascular biopsy of vertebrobasilar aneurysm in patient with polyarteritis nodosa. Front Neurol. 2021; 12:697105.Google Scholar3 Chenbhanich J, Hu Y, Hetts S, Cooke D, Dowd C, Devine P, UCLA Clinical Genomics Center , Russell B, Kang SHL, Chang VY, et al. Segmental overgrowth and aneurysms due to mosaic pdgfrb p.(tyr562cys). Am J Med Genet A. 2021; 185:1430‐1436.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Barak T, Ristori E, Ercan‐Sencicek AG, Miyagishima DF, Nelson‐Williams C, Dong W, Jin SC, Prendergast A, Armero W, Henegariu O, et al. Ppil4 is essential for brain angiogenesis and implicated in intracranial aneurysms in humans. Nat Med. 2021; 27:2165‐2175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar5 Lawton MT, Abla AA, Rutledge WC, Benet A, Zador Z, Rayz VL, Saloner D, Halbach VV. Bypass surgery for the treatment of dolichoectatic basilar trunk aneurysms: a work in progress. Neurosurgery. 2016; 79:83‐99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails September 2022Vol 2, Issue 5Article InformationMetrics © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., and the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology by Wiley Periodicals LLC.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.122.000354 Manuscript receivedJanuary 20, 2022Manuscript acceptedMay 23, 2022Originally publishedJuly 18, 2022 PDF download